Mercantyl vs. BigCommerce

BigCommerce and Mercantyl are both modern, API-first platforms. The difference is intent. BigCommerce was built for DTC and added a B2B Edition. Mercantyl was built B2B from the start. If wholesale is your primary motion, you’ll feel that on day one.

The honest answer

BigCommerce B2B Edition is genuinely solid for hybrid shops where DTC is the bigger half. If wholesale is your primary motion (multi-brand, NET terms, EDI, RFQ), Mercantyl is built for that as the default rather than the bolt-on.

Capability comparison

CapabilityBigCommerceMercantyl
Per-buyer pricingB2B Edition tier (~$1K+/mo)Native on every plan
Multi-brand catalogsOne store per brandUnlimited brands per account
NET terms / invoicingLimited, third-party apps requiredNET 30/60/90 native with credit limits
Quote-to-orderB2B Edition basic, complex flows need appsFull RFQ to quote to PO with approvals
MOQ enforcementApps requiredNative per SKU per buyer
EDI / PunchoutThird-party integration onlyNative (X12, EDIFACT, CXML, OCI)
App ecosystem~600 apps; many overlap and conflictNo app store. Every B2B feature native
Headless / APIStrong API, but B2B objects are second-classBuyer accounts, contract pricing, NET terms first-class
Self-serve setupPlus tiers usually need a partner agencySelf-serve in your browser, days not months

When BigCommerce shops switch

You're running multiple brands

BigCommerce charges per store. Mercantyl charges per account. If you're consolidating 3+ brands, the math separates fast.

You need pricing-engine depth

BigCommerce B2B Edition has tier pricing. Mercantyl adds account overrides, contract pricing, MOQ enforcement, and per-buyer visibility natively.

You don't want a partner agency

Most BigCommerce B2B implementations go through certified partners. Mercantyl is self-serve from signup to live.

Move your wholesale GMV to Mercantyl

14-day trial. Migration assistance included. You can keep BigCommerce for DTC and run Mercantyl for B2B if that fits. They sync cleanly via the API.